In response to someone mentioning Exodus 21 which refers to zygote/embryo/foetus this way:
Exodus 21
21:22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Beijing said -
So does that mean that Epps’ Bill (now thankfully defunct) was actually more of an agricultural measure to compensate for the loss of fruit?
Why, oh why the eff didn’t I say that?
But Beijing York said it -
In the comment section at Unrepentant Hippie - post titled North Dakota: where life starts in a petri dish
In response to someone mentioning Exodus 21 which refers to zygote/embryo/foetus this way:
Exodus 21
21:22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
Beijing said -
So does that mean that Epps’ Bill (now thankfully defunct) was actually more of an agricultural measure to compensate for the loss of fruit?